Public pensions presented one of the biggest and most complicated problems the 2013 Legislature tackled.

Collaborative approach

Lawmakers and Gov. Steve Bullock approached the challenge the right way: An interim committee composed of equal numbers of Democrats and Republicans gathered a lot of information for decision makers. Lawmakers, local governments, state workers and retirees worked on bills. Legislative leadership appointed a select committee on pensions early in the session. Bullock made his position clear with support of specific pension bills, which he signed into law Monday.

The pension bills that the Legislature and Bullock agreed on contain elements necessary for eliminating the unfunded liability. Montana public employees will have to increase their pension contributions. Employers (that means the state, counties, cities and school districts) will be required to increase their pension contributions.

The state will transfer $128 million in cash into public pension funds over the next two years. About $14 million will be transferred from school district retirement funds to the Teachers Retirement System. Future employees still will be part of the defined-benefit system, but they will have to work longer and pay more for their benefits.

A pension fix is imperative because the state of Montana has a constitutional obligation to fund public pensions to make them actuarially sound. Most of the state’s pension programs have unfunded liabilities that would total $4.3 billion over the next 30 years. That is an obligation the state must pay.

Actuarial analysis shows the teachers retirement fund covering its presently unfunded liability in 22 years under the new pension law. Previously, it was projected to never amortize. The Public Employees Retirement System did not amortize its unfunded liability under previous law; the fiscal note with the Public Employees Retirement System bill says it will amortize in 15 years.

Progress has been made. But will the new laws really resolve the unfunded-liability problem?

Lawsuit imminent

There are two major hurdles for the pension fix of 2013. First, the legislation was amended from the original version Bullock endorsed and a reduction in retirees’ annual cost of living adjustment was added. The new law immediately slices the Guaranteed Annual Benefit Adjustment from 3 percent to 1.5 percent.

The Legislature’s own attorneys cautioned lawmakers that the GABA cut is likely to be illegal. A lawsuit is expected, perhaps as early as this week, in an attempt to invalidate that part of the new law before it takes effect on July 1.

The GABA cut would leave state retirees with less income than they bargained for. But without the benefit cut, closing the pension funds’ deficits would take more time.

Second, the pension analysis assumes an average annual return of 7.75 percent.

According to information provided to lawmakers, none of the state pension funds have a return that high over the long term. Since inception in 1994, the net rates of return for the pensions ranged from 7.04 percent to 7.45 percent as of Feb. 28.

Time will tell if Montana’s public pensions were fixed this year or if further action will be needed next session.


More from

(4) comments


who cares about the retirement of ordinary people that go to work everyday, tax to death everyday and who's retirement can't be taxpayer funded every time the pension funds stock investments bounce to the bottom side like the rest of us taxpayer slaves ? tell your children when they grow up, make sure to become a non productive, non producing government leech.


Im sure the City Garbage man works harder than some ranchers who inherited there ranch..


it could have all been resolved and redirected with coal tax revenues and huge revenues from the oil debacle going put the money in , change benefits for future retirees and increase the workers one should be guaranteed anything in this life.

yes lawsuit will prevail.....they didn't consider fulfilling current obligations...over time these benefits will diminish obviously by death of retirees currently drawing and by phasing in new rules.....

I balance a checkbook every month and could have been for hire for less than what the legislators were paid for a senseless session....


Get your facts straight, Gazette. HB 454 reduces GABA to less than 1%, not 1.5%. As the Governor's own representative said, any reduction in contracted payments is unconstitutional. It's unfortunate retirees on fixed incomes are being forced to fund a lawsuit to confirm that.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.