Guest opinion: Bullock made tough, right decision to veto HB12

2013-06-03T00:00:00Z Guest opinion: Bullock made tough, right decision to veto HB12By FRANKE WILMER The Billings Gazette
June 03, 2013 12:00 am  • 

In four terms in the Montana Legislature few decisions have been as difficult as whether to uphold the governor’s veto on House Bill 12. It increases funding to businesses providing services to Medicaid patients and it passed with bipartisan support. Funding for increases to these providers was cut in 2010. Struggling with the devastating effects of the recession, many programs took hits then — including university budgets with students paying higher tuition; the Big Sky Rx program was capped, leaving many seniors without assistance for expensive prescriptions; child protection services and tribal college programs were also cutback, or increases rescinded.

No other backfill bills

HB12 is the only bill that backfills any of the funding lost in 2010. We didn’t pass a bill to backfill university tuition, tribal college assistance, child protection services, senior prescriptions and so on. All are worthy.

Every spending bill goes through tremendous scrutiny both for its policy content and budget impact. It must pass House appropriations and Senate finance committees, and both chambers. Then the governor gets a final look — and it was his judgment that paying for all the bills passed put us too close to budgetary structural imbalance, where we literally take in less than we spend by $21 million — nearly a third of it in HB12.

Second, HB2, the budget bill, already increased funding for direct care workers, Medicaid providers, and people with development disabilities — $65 million, including a 2 percent increase in provider reimbursement each year of the biennium. It’s overdue. It’s a little less than state employees received (although some will get no raise at all) and they do some of the most challenging work for some of the lowest wages in the state. HB2 increases provider reimbursement rates for the first time in four years.

Third, nothing in HB12 guarantees that the money will be used to increase employee wages, increase employee benefits, hire more employees or provide more services. I understand why providers want the backfilled money they thought was coming their way, and I know that many get by only because of the generosity of local donors in their own communities. They do work that matters. Some might use the funding to improve employee wages and benefits, but those are permanent commitments and this is one-time-only funding.

Bill transmittal delayed

The governor might have offered an amendatory veto to HB12 or any of the more than 200 bills that came to his desk when it was too late to amend them and send them back to the Legislature for approval. But the Republican leadership didn’t give him that opportunity because they held up too many bills until the last days of the session, foreclosing the governor’s option of offering amendments.

When HB12 came to him, he was looking at a structural imbalance in the budget, a bill that backfilled cuts for only one program over all the others that took hits during the recession, and beneficiaries who were already included in the budget increases in HB2. He might have thought “I’d be a lot more popular if I didn’t veto this bill.” But he did the tough thing.

We work with two figures in balancing the budget. One is the actual money in the bank now minus the actual money going out in expenditures now. That’s what the governor determined was at risk.

The other is money we expect to have in the bank at the end of two years. That’s a higher figure and some legislators argue for spending the higher figure — but two years is a long time. Try budgeting your expected income for your expected expenses for two years. I know the governor didn’t do the easy thing, and supporting his decision was not easy either. But I will respect his reasons for vetoing HB12.

Democrat Franke Wilmer of Bozeman represents House District 63.

Copyright 2015 The Billings Gazette. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

More from the Gazette

Guest opinion: Let's invest county college levy locally

Guest opinion: Let's invest county college levy locally

January 26, 2015 12:00 am Photos



Guest opinion: Time to fix Montana's DNA testing law

January 22, 2015 12:00 amLoading…

Guest opinion: Boosting Montana's high school graduation rate

January 21, 2015 12:00 amLoading…

Guest opinion: Kidnapped Nigerian girls? Still missing

January 20, 2015 12:00 amLoading…

Guest opinion: Montana must improve workplace safety

January 16, 2015 9:16 amLoading…

Guest opinion: Mont., S.D. landowners worry about pipeline risks

January 16, 2015 12:00 amLoading…

Follow The Billings Gazette

Popular Stories

Get weekly ads via e-mail

Deals & Offers

Featured Businesses