Guest opinion: Montana business benefits from federal public lands

2014-07-06T00:00:00Z Guest opinion: Montana business benefits from federal public landsBy STEVE CANNON The Billings Gazette
July 06, 2014 12:00 am  • 

The 27 million acres of public lands in Montana lend lifestyle and amenity advantages to communities and small businesses, driving entrepreneurs and outdoorsmen alike. Around 64,000 jobs and countless small, community-oriented businesses thrive thanks to our federally managed public lands, creating one of Montana’s most recession-proof economic drivers.

Out-of-state special interests are promoting an agenda that would eliminate federal ownership of public lands. Proponents claim this will spur short-term economic development while eliminating protections that ensure plentiful wildlife and access. Some Montanans are getting swept up in the rhetoric, not realizing the very real and negative consequences this would have on all who enjoy the benefits of our vast public lands.

The effort to “take the public out of public lands” fails to examine the real details of what state ownership of our public lands would mean. In fact, proponents ignore significant costs associated with land management. For small businesses that would have to absorb the tax burden of state management, these details are crucial. This plan underscores previous agendas that have been advanced by the same special interests to sell our public lands to the highest bidder. This course would severely weaken Montana’s $5.8 billion outdoor economy that provides 64,000 jobs.

If Montana is interested in assuming control of our public lands, specific questions must be answered before we consider growing state government so exponentially.

What does this land grab mean for hundreds of thousands of Montanans and millions of visitors who use our public lands for recreation? What does this mean for the management of issues such as firefighting and habitat protection? Equally important, what does this mean for the high-tech industry that utilizes Montana’s federal public lands as a vital advantage in recruiting employees and high-paying positions to their companies? And what guarantee do we have that this won’t mean selling off federal public lands, shutting out Montanans and visitors alike?

A recent poll conducted for Business for Montana’s Outdoors found that more than 70 percent of businesses in Montana cite public lands as a major factor in their decision to expand or start a business in Montana. Certainly, our federal public lands are an advantageous tool for young, energetic, highly skilled people who value a high quality of life as much as high paying jobs.

Public land management is difficult. But Montanans have a long tradition of working collaboratively to address issues of litigation and poorly planned development where our public lands are concerned. Recent efforts have resulted in made-in-Montana proposals like the North Fork Protection Act, the Rocky Mountain Front and Heritage Act and the recent Farm Bill provision to expedite logging on 5.1 million acres of National Forest land.

While this latest push against federal land management is a year in the making, there has been little to no outreach to the Montana business community or to the outdoor industry to invite discussion into this short-sighted effort.

Public lands set the West apart from the rest of the nation. Most of us live and work in Montana because of our federal public lands. They afford an economic benefit and a way of life that give us an advantage in creating jobs and attracting talent to our communities. Pushing for the elimination of federal public lands is not in the best interest of Montana.

Steve Cannon moved to Bozeman six years ago to help launch Schedulicity where he is vice president of sales and business development, and a member of Business for Montana’s Outdoors.

Copyright 2015 The Billings Gazette. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Comment policy

We provide this forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the day's news. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and abuse are not. You must be logged into a personal account on Facebook to comment (FAQ). Readers are responsible for their comments and abuse of this privilege will not be tolerated. We reserve the right, without warning or notification, to remove comments and block users we determine violate our Terms of Service. Comments reflect the opinions of the author - not those of The Billings Gazette or its parent company.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

More from the Gazette

Guest opinion: Pre-K plan smart move for Montana business

March 27, 2015 12:00 am(1)
Guest opinion: Early Edge will benefit rural students

Guest opinion: Early Edge will benefit rural students

March 27, 2015 12:00 am(0)
Guest opinion: Those who can work shouldn't get SNAP

Guest opinion: Those who can work shouldn't get SNAP

March 26, 2015 12:00 am(10)

Janine Pease: Spend more time with your kids

March 23, 2015 12:00 am(0)
Guest view: Invest in Montana, not Wall Street

Guest view: Invest in Montana, not Wall Street

March 22, 2015 9:00 am(0)

CSKT compact will prevent litigation, not create more

March 20, 2015 6:00 am(0)

Guest view: Politics or prudent money management?

March 19, 2015 6:00 am(0)

Guest view: Partisan politics put ahead of Montana people

March 18, 2015 6:00 am(2)

Guest view: Time to celebrate the history of the Irish

March 17, 2015 6:30 am(0)
Early Edge would give Montana children a leg up for the future

Early Edge would give Montana children a leg up for the future

March 17, 2015 6:30 am(0)
Guest opinion: Who will enforce our election laws if COPP's budget is cut?

Guest opinion: Who will enforce our election laws if COPP's budget is cut?

March 15, 2015 12:00 am(5)

Follow The Billings Gazette

Popular Stories

Get weekly ads via e-mail

Deals & Offers

Featured Businesses