Submit a Letter to the Editor

The Billings Gazette welcomes readers' comments.

Diluted bitumen doesn't add risk to pipeline

2013-01-05T00:00:00Z 2013-01-07T10:58:06Z Diluted bitumen doesn't add risk to pipeline The Billings Gazette
January 05, 2013 12:00 am

A lot has been said in recent months about the nature of the oil that will be transported in TransCanada’s Keystone XL pipeline in Montana, South Dakota and Nebraska. Unfortunately, much of the information used by opponents of our project is based upon myths and misperceptions about the Canadian oil sands and pipelines that carry crude oil.

Like most oil pipelines in North America, Keystone XL is designed to carry various grades of crude oil from different sources, all of which must meet strict tariff specifications and regulatory requirements in the U.S. and Canada. The composition of oil sands crude is very similar to California heavy oil and the other heavy oils already being transported and refined on the Gulf Coast of Texas every day.

It is true that raw bitumen must be diluted in order to flow efficiently through a pipeline, but this does not make the oil any more corrosive or dangerous. More than a dozen studies conducted in the last few years have shown that diluted bitumen and other crude oils derived from the oil sands have the same characteristics as traditional light crude oils and pose no added risks to pipeline safety.

TransCanada is not just in the business of delivering products from Canada’s oil sands. Up to one-quarter of the capacity of the Keystone XL pipeline will be devoted to transporting light, sweet crude produced from the Bakken formation in Montana and North Dakota.

Alex Pourbaix

President, Energy and Oil Pipelines

TransCanada Corp.

Calgary, Alberta


Copyright 2015 The Billings Gazette. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(4) Comments

  1. DavidWright
    Report Abuse
    DavidWright - January 05, 2013 10:17 am
    The Gazette should charge for advertising
  2. billy banger
    Report Abuse
    billy banger - January 05, 2013 8:11 am
    The question is not what is in the pipeline but who will build it, canadian or american workers?
    Also why ship it to the gulf coast which is a tax free zone to be sent to China. Also is any of this refined crude going into the American markets to reduce our dependence on other oil?
  3. Gordon Shumway
    Report Abuse
    Gordon Shumway - January 05, 2013 7:54 am
    Duh, bitumen, isn't that asphalt.
  4. Abraham
    Report Abuse
    Abraham - January 05, 2013 6:46 am
    Wow, you make it sound almost harmless, oil is oil, oil pollutes, how you going to cover that one up.

Comment policy

We provide this forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the day's news. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and abuse are not. You must be logged into a personal account on Facebook to comment (FAQ). Readers are responsible for their comments and abuse of this privilege will not be tolerated. We reserve the right, without warning or notification, to remove comments and block users we determine violate our Terms of Service. Comments reflect the opinions of the author - not those of The Billings Gazette or its parent company.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

More from the Gazette