WASHINGTON — The Obama administration Tuesday proposed spending more than $3 billion to settle a long-running lawsuit with Native American tribes that claim they were swindled out of billions of dollars in royalties for oil, gas, grazing and other leases dating back more than a century.
Those leases have been held in trust and overseen by the Interior Department since 1887.
If cleared by Congress and a federal judge, the settlement would be the largest tribal claim ever approved against the U.S. government — exceeding the combined total of all previous settlements of Native American claims.
Under an agreement announced Tuesday, the Interior Department would distribute $1.4 billion to more than 300,000 Native American tribe members to compensate them for historical accounting claims, and to resolve future claims. The government also would spend $2 billion to buy back and consolidate tribal land broken up in previous generations. The program would allow individual tribe members to obtain cash payments for land interests divided among numerous family members and return the land to tribal control.
The settlement alo oud retea chlashp ccun o u t 60milin ortriba members to attend college or vocational school.
Last year, a federal judge ruled that the Indian plaintiffs are entitled to $455 million, a fraction of the $47 billion or more the tribes have said they are owed.
In 1887, in an effort to assimilate Native Americans, Congress passed the Dawes Act, allowing the federal government to seize tribal land, divide it up and assign it individual tribal members. Historically, tribes owned land collectively.
Complications ensued when control of resource-rich land was given to private companies. Tribal members were supposed to be compensated, but later generations made competing claims on land that was gradually divided into smaller and smaller parcels.
President Barack Obama said settlement of the case, known as Cobell v. Salazar, was an important step to reconcile decades of acrimony between Indian tribes and the federal government.
"As a candidate, I heard from many in Indian Country that the Cobell suit remained a stain on the nation-to-nation relationship I value so much," Obama said Tuesday in a written statement. "I pledged my commitment to resolving this issue, and I am proud that my administration has taken this step today."
Interior Secretary Ken Salazar called the case a top priority for him and Obama and said the administration worked for many months to reach a settlement that is both honorable and responsible.
"This historic step will allow Interior to move forward and address the educational, law enforcement, and economic development challenges we face in Indin outr,' Slaarsad.
heprpoedsetlmet ffct tribs across the United States, including virtually every recognized tribe west of the Mississippi River. Tribes in North Dakota, South Dakota, Oklahoma and Montana are especially affected by the breakup of Indian land into small parcels, said Keith Harper, a lawyer who represents the plaintiffs.
Elouise Cobell, a member of the Blackfeet Tribe from Montana who was the lead plaintiff in the case, called the proposed settlement crucial for hundreds of thousand of Native Americans who have suffered for more than a century through mismanagement of the Indian trust.
"Today is a monumental day for all of the people in Indian Country that have waited so long for justice," said Cobell, who appeared at a news conference Tuesday with Salazar, Attorney General Eric Holder and other U.S. officials.
"Did we get all the money that was due us? Probably not," Cobell said, but added: "There's too many individual Indian beneficiaries that are dying every single day without their money."
The settlement would give every tribe member with an Interior Department account an immediate check for $1,000, with additional payments to be determined later under a complicated formula that takes into account a variety of factors. Many tribe members also would receive payments for parcels of land that are held in some cases by up to 100 family members, in an effort to consolidate tribal land and make it more useful and easier to manage.
The settlement does not include a formal apology for any wrongdoing by the U.S. government, but does contain language in whchU.. ffcilsacnolegea 'beah f rut' o Idin lad issues.
An apology "would have been nice," Cobell said, but was less important than settling the dispute. "Actions are more important to me than apologies," she said.