Handful of Montanans won protection for Scapegoat — first citizen-designated wilderness in U.S.

2012-08-05T08:11:00Z 2012-08-05T23:56:29Z Handful of Montanans won protection for Scapegoat — first citizen-designated wilderness in U.S.By MARTIN KIDSTON Missoulian The Billings Gazette
August 05, 2012 8:11 am  • 

LINCOLN — While camped above Ringeye Falls in the 1950s, Cecil Garland pulled an elk reed bugle from his duffel bag and released a call into the September air.

“All through the frosty fall air the calls echoed back and forth and I knew I’d found wilderness,” Garland testified before the U.S. Senate on Sept. 23, 1968. “But all was not at peace in my heart; for I knew that someday, for some unknown reason, man would try to destroy this country as man had altered and destroyed before.”

As Garland lay down that night to sleep with the stars cast wide across the Montana sky, he made a vow to keep the backcountry north of Lincoln as pure as the day he found it.

The “Lincoln Back Country,” as he called it, would become the Scapegoat Wilderness. It was in 1972 – 40 years ago this summer – and it marked the first citizen-designated wilderness in the country.

But while it served as a victory to wilderness advocates, the U.S. Forest Service viewed it as a dangerous precedent, one that threatened the agency’s autonomy and its plans for the nation’s lands.

Demand for timber boomed with the onset of World War II and the Forest Service was eager to provide it. Logging trucks rumbled over new roads, saws toppled mighty trees and timber production jumped to new heights.

Despite the uptick in activity, Lincoln and the great tracts of land to its north remained undisturbed. A logging road connected Lincoln with Ovando. Traveling west to Missoula or east to Great Falls required a drive south through Helena.

The regional Forest Service office in Missoula had quietly made plans to develop the Lincoln backcountry with roads for timber. By 1960, residents in Lincoln and surrounding communities, including Seeley Lake and Ovando, caught wind of the plans and weren’t pleased with the news.

“When all this started going down in 1966, I was old enough to know it was a struggle,” said Jack Rich, a longtime outfitter and guide who grew up in Seeley Lake.

The lines had been drawn in the Montana wild. Advocates for protection would find themselves facing a powerful Forest Service and its allies. It was shaping up to be a long battle, and perseverance would serve as their only hope of success.

With a bulldozer sitting outside Lincoln ready to run a “flag-line” into the backcountry, Garland made a desperate move. He picked up the phone and called Rep. Jim Battin, Montana’s Republican congressman back in Washington.

As Garland tells the story, Battin listened keenly before calling Regional Forester Boyd Rasmussen. He asked Rasmussen for 10 more days before the road building began.

While Garland worked the phones with Montana’s congressional delegation, including Battin and Sen. Lee Metcalf, a Democrat, he also rallied folks up and down the Blackfoot Valley.

They formed the Lincoln Back Country Protection Association in 1964. The nation’s first citizen-designated wilderness would find its roots in rural cafes and around the kitchen tables of Montana families.

The Lincoln backcountry was initially seen as 75,000 acres on the north end of the Lincoln Ranger District of the Helena National Forest. It was separated by the Scapegoat Mountain region from the newly established Bob Marshall Wilderness.

But protection advocates pushed for 200,000 acres, insisting that any protection include the Scapegoat Mountain region. They envisioned a “complex” of wild lands, uninterrupted, and the Wilderness Society back in Washington, D.C., had taken note, as had Metcalf and fellow Sen. Mike Mansfield, D-Mont.

The two Montana senators introduced a bill in 1965 to protect 75,000 acres of the Lincoln backcountry. Upon learning of the Democrats’ bill, Battin upped the ante, introducing a Republican measure to preserve 240,000 acres as the Lincoln-Scapegoat Wilderness.

Battin’s bill won the support of Metcalf and Mansfield, but even then it had hurdles to clear.

When the act passed the Senate in 1969, the Forest Service was less than pleased. Regional Forester Neal Rahm lamented at having lost control of the wilderness debate, as did other members of Congress.

“Why should a sporting goods and hardware dealer (Cecil Garland) in Lincoln, Montana, designate the boundaries for a 240,000-acre … addition to the Bob Marshall?” Rahm wrote. “If the lines are to be drawn, we should be drawing them.”

The 1969 bill designating the Lincoln-Scapegoat Wilderness would linger in the House for two additional years – the result of last-minute political wrangling.

“The Scapegoat is a wilderness today because of those citizen efforts and the reception of Lee Metcalf,” Rich said. “If it wasn’t for Metcalf, it would not have happened.”

Some 50 million acres of land still remain pristine, but unprotected. Of that, 6 million acres lie in Montana as potential wilderness. The debate on whether to protect it or release it for development is as hot now as it was 40 years ago.

The question becomes, what legacy will this generation leave behind?

“There’s still a heated debate over what lands should be wilderness, or if there’s some other type of designation that could be applied,” said Rich. “Back in the ’60s, it wasn’t a highly funded political campaign that did this. The little people won by speaking from the heart with integrity and honesty.”

Copyright 2015 The Billings Gazette. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(9) Comments

  1. Cowboy Fred
    Report Abuse
    Cowboy Fred - August 06, 2012 11:50 am
    LOL riiiiiiiiiiiiight
  2. Cowboy Fred
    Report Abuse
    Cowboy Fred - August 06, 2012 11:49 am
    You may try reading my post again. I said I'm fine with the way it is right now and consider it a fair compromise, as did bigsky. At least you can make your point without going into a full incoherent rant, like skinkwanker.
  3. farwestgal
    Report Abuse
    farwestgal - August 06, 2012 11:09 am
    Thank heavens for Cecil Garland and men and women like him...If not for them the whole of Montana would look like the Berkeley Pit.
  4. Jamey
    Report Abuse
    Jamey - August 06, 2012 5:56 am
    Fred and bigsky - the thing about wilderness is once, it is no longer wilderness, it will never be wilderness. Destroy it now and it is gone forever. Nobody wants "the entire state" to be a wilderness area but many want to preserve the last few areas remaining. Its called conservation. Too bad the conservatives today don't believe in conserving natural places.
  5. Cowboy Fred
    Report Abuse
    Cowboy Fred - August 05, 2012 7:01 pm
    What "it really is” is all relative, dependent on each individuals planned use of the land.
  6. hikertrash
    Report Abuse
    hikertrash - August 05, 2012 4:04 pm
    Some people look at the forest and see money, others see it for what it really is.
  7. bigskynative
    Report Abuse
    bigskynative - August 05, 2012 3:34 pm
    I have no problem with what we have for wilderness now, but I agree we don't need more. All this does is lock up land that only the back and horse packer can use, much less destroy job potential for hardworking montanans. Nice story, but that is only one side to it.....
  8. Cowboy Fred
    Report Abuse
    Cowboy Fred - August 05, 2012 2:02 pm
    To be fair,I think there is a decent mix right now, but the huggers want to turn the entire state in a wilderness area.
  9. Jamey
    Report Abuse
    Jamey - August 05, 2012 8:34 am
    Can you imagine a republican today, doing what Jim Battin did in the 1960's? Thankfully the republicans back then aren't like they are today or else everywhere would be accessible by a road and our wilderness areas would be non-existent.

Comment policy

We provide this forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the day's news. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and abuse are not. You must be logged into a personal account on Facebook to comment (FAQ). Readers are responsible for their comments and abuse of this privilege will not be tolerated. We reserve the right, without warning or notification, to remove comments and block users we determine violate our Terms of Service. Comments reflect the opinions of the author - not those of The Billings Gazette or its parent company.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

More from the Gazette

Bullock, legislators agree: Heavy lifting coming in Legislature’s second half

Bullock, legislators agree: Heavy lifting coming in Legislature’s second half

3 hours ago(0)
House rejects funding for Homeland Security

House rejects funding for Homeland Security

3 hours ago Photos

Photos

(0)
Foodie expert: Touring TV chef's show coming to Butte

Foodie expert: Touring TV chef's show coming to Butte

7 hours ago(0)
Gas prices rise over $2

Gas prices rise over $2

8 hours ago(0)
Trial opens in mountain lion hunting case

Trial opens in mountain lion hunting case

8 hours ago(1)
7 whooping cough cases reported since January

7 whooping cough cases reported since January

8 hours ago(0)
Recent hunting incidents spark new ethics campaign

Recent hunting incidents spark new ethics campaign

9 hours ago(0)
FWP helps whitetail buck lose twine, antler necklace

FWP helps whitetail buck lose twine, antler necklace

10 hours ago(0)
Coal tax diversion bill moves to Montana House

Coal tax diversion bill moves to Montana House

February 26, 2015 6:30 pm(0)
Bill easing penalty for guns at school dies in House

Bill easing penalty for guns at school dies in House

February 26, 2015 2:48 pm(1)
Flathead Reservation poaching cases result in fines for 6 people

Flathead Reservation poaching cases result in fines for 6 people

February 26, 2015 2:46 pm(0)

Follow The Billings Gazette

Popular Stories

Get weekly ads via e-mail

Deals & Offers

Featured Businesses