PPL sues EPA to keep power plant upgrades secret

2012-04-23T16:41:00Z 2012-04-23T18:25:27Z PPL sues EPA to keep power plant upgrades secretThe Associated Press The Associated Press
April 23, 2012 4:41 pm  • 

HELENA -- PPL Montana sued the Environmental Protection Agency on Monday to prevent the federal agency from releasing data about its Colstrip power plant to two environmental groups that want to know what upgrades the 1970s-era coal-fired plant has undergone.

PPL claims in the lawsuit that the data the EPA plans to release includes 24 years' worth of capital improvement projects that the company considers confidential, and the company's competitors could use that information to gain market advantage.

The Montana Environmental Information Center and the Sierra Club had requested the information through the federal Freedom of Information Act.

Anne Hedges, the center's program director, said she first made the information request two years ago to find out what equipment has been installed at the Colstrip plant and whether it is in compliance with the law.

The plant was grandfathered in under the Clean Air Act and was not required to comply with the tougher pollution control standards unless the plant's operator made upgrades modernizing it. The industry had argued at the time that plants such as Colstrip would eventually be retired, but many have instead been upgraded and expanded without the same pollution controls as newer plants, according to the Sierra Club.

"We just want to know what has happened at that plant over the last 20 years. What equipment have they installed?" Hedges said. "This is an old, filthy, out-of-date facility that deserves the same controls" as a newer plant.

PPL spokesman David Hoffman declined to comment other than to say," I think we're in a good position and we're correct."

The first two units of the 2,000-megawatt power plant began operating in the mid-1970s, and two more units came online in 1984 and 1986. PPL's website says the Colstrip plant is the second-largest coal-fired project west of the Mississippi and uses a rail car worth of coal every five minutes.

But its sulfur dioxide emissions are less than what is required under the Clean Air Act and the plant meets EPA standards for nitrogen oxides emissions, according to the company.

The company said it received notice on April 9 that the EPA had determined that PPL's capital improvements data was not confidential and the agency planned to release the information after 10 business days. That prompted the company to file the lawsuit asking a judge to block the release.

PPL said in the lawsuit that the EPA should have granted it an exemption to the freedom of information law that deals with trade secrets and confidential commercial or financial information. That exemption says a federal agency can't release the information under FOIA if it causes substantial harm to the competitive position of the person from whom the information was obtained.

Competitors would be able to figure out the life of the individual units of the plants and the likely timing for replacing components, "which would allow them to vie for market share through aggressive pricing and to strategically time and improve their own capital improvement processes, all to PPL Montana's detriment," the lawsuit reads.

The EPA declined to comment. Hedges dismissed the company's competitive claims.

"How upgrades to a facility that occurred years ago can be confidential information is beyond me, and it appears that the EPA doesn't agree with PPL, either," Hedges said. "Let's expose them to the light of day. If they are in compliance with the law, great, if not, they should be held to the same standards."

A hearing has not yet been set on PPL's claims.


Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(7) Comments

  1. Cowboy Fred
    Report Abuse
    Cowboy Fred - April 24, 2012 4:48 pm
    Tree huggers, mind your own business, humps.
  2. mtboy
    Report Abuse
    mtboy - April 24, 2012 2:41 pm
    TapZoo, all I am saying is that if the Colstrip plants are in compliance, which is sounds like they are, why does matter the specific dollar amount spent or the various components, upgrades to the components, and year it was spent? No I don't work at for ppl, i just have a basic knowledge that industry and general business.

    Of course they make money, and I am probably sure remodling projects are done with some of that money, not sure....... But isn't that the point of a business? To make money
  3. WatchingU
    Report Abuse
    WatchingU - April 24, 2012 11:14 am
    billy banger, You should get a job so you can understand how the business world works.
  4. WatchingU
    Report Abuse
    WatchingU - April 24, 2012 11:12 am
    An Hedges is a Californian that has moved to Montana and is trying to change Montana to how it is in California. She should go back to California.
    There are not many alternatives to coal fired plants. Windmill farms only produce power when the wind blows. There are not any nuclear plants in Montana. Not enough hydro power in Montana to make a difference.
    The people of Montana are spoiled. They are used to getting steady, reliable electricity from the Colstrip plants.
  5. TapZoo
    Report Abuse
    TapZoo - April 24, 2012 8:33 am
    Sounds like mtboy works there or actually has done his homework for a change. If nothing to hide, prove it. Can't tell me they are not making tons of money with their outdated equipment or they wouldn't have been able to remodel their corporate office downtown.
  6. mtboy
    Report Abuse
    mtboy - April 23, 2012 9:55 pm
    ripping who off??........ To my knowledge, and per de-regulation....... ppl sells power on the open market in the NW region power grid. Utility companies (like NWE, SME, etc) then buy that power on the market value or per negotiated contract prices. Not sure ppl is in any position to rip anyone off? Unless I am missing something.......

    I think PPL is correct, they should only have to disclose that information to EPA, not to individual "watch dog" groups.
  7. billy banger
    Report Abuse
    billy banger - April 23, 2012 9:20 pm
    Sounds like ppl has something to hide. Fess us and let us know how you have been ripping us off.

Comment policy

We provide this forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the day's news. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and abuse are not. You must be logged into a personal account on Facebook to comment (FAQ). Readers are responsible for their comments and abuse of this privilege will not be tolerated. We reserve the right, without warning or notification, to remove comments and block users we determine violate our Terms of Service. Comments reflect the opinions of the author - not those of The Billings Gazette or its parent company.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

More from the Gazette

Panel tables bill for Butte vets’ home

Panel tables bill for Butte vets’ home

12 hours ago(0)
House endorses bill to stiffen campaign finance laws

House endorses bill to stiffen campaign finance laws

14 hours ago Photos


Related (0)
Mine dispute involving former Gov. Schweitzer headed for trial

Mine dispute involving former Gov. Schweitzer headed for trial

16 hours ago(0)
Stillwater Mining closing Billings offices

Stillwater Mining closing Billings offices

17 hours ago(0)
Virginia man commits suicide in Glacier National Park

Virginia man commits suicide in Glacier National Park

21 hours ago(0)
Curious graffiti messages springing up across Butte

Curious graffiti messages springing up across Butte

22 hours ago(0)

Follow The Billings Gazette

Popular Stories

Get weekly ads via e-mail

Deals & Offers

Featured Businesses