Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Gazette opinion: City fails to protect those in need of help

Gazette opinion: City fails to protect those in need of help

  • Updated

In the very early hours of Tuesday, the city of Billings made history.

Unfortunately, it will likely be remembered that we have chosen to be on the wrong side of history. At least for now. 

The Billings City Council defeated the much-discussed nondiscrimination ordinance that would have made it illegal to discriminate against someone based on sexual identity. Billings Mayor Tom Hanel cast the deciding vote, in the process implicating a civic organization that does much good.

What the council did on Tuesday morning was clear and unmistakable. It sent the message that it's OK not to hire because someone is gay. It's OK to choose an inferior job candidate because someone is lesbian. Don't rent to gays. Be hostile to those who may be different -- what can they do? 

The council says -- as far as Billings goes -- there's nothing to be done. It's not the city's place to protect its residents from discrimination. 

Simply put, the city has failed to protect its own citizens -- people who are already here, born here, contributing here. At many public hearings gay, lesbians, and transgendered residents and their supporters came and spoke up, sharing stories of discrimination. Ultimately, the council failed to believe them, and failed to give them a minimum modicum of protection. Those in power decided to not use theirs to help those who don't have any. 

What is just as offensive is that the council has heard stories of where discrimination likely played a role, and didn't act. By not passing the nondiscrimination ordinance, the council has chosen to discount those stories. 

Mayor Hanel applied Rotary's "Four Way Test," which includes questions: Is it fair to all concerned; is it the truth; will it build goodwill and better friendships; and will it be beneficial to all concerned?

How he could weigh those questions in light of the NDO and not have it pass is simply baffling, bordering on insincere. This entire effort to create a nondiscrimination ordinance is simply about fairness. The truth is that Hanel and the other council members didn't have to search for stories of discrimination -- they came right to them in the form of gay, lesbian and transgendered folks who shared their stories at the public hearings. This ordinance couldn't have helped but build a better, more inclusive community (read: goodwill). And, it would have been beneficial as Billings would continue to be known for its tolerance, openness and fair treatment of all citizens. That reputation would have been good for the entire community.

We can't help but think that Hanel, by invoking Rotary, was trying to side-step responsibility for his own vote -- as if Rotary had something to do with it. In the end, Hanel cast the deciding vote, but his vote wouldn't have mattered if five other council members wouldn't have joined him. And, Hanel's vote should be his and his alone, not the byproduct of service club. 

We were put on the right side of history by our reaction to bigotry against the Jewish community 20 years ago. Sadly "Not In Our Town" now takes a slightly different shade after Tuesday's vote.

What kind of message does that send to our youth about leadership? Hanel and others admitted the NDO cause might be just, but the timing was wrong. So it's OK not to do the right thing if the timing is wrong? Leadership is about doing what's right regardless of timing. 

And so Hanel and the other five (Shaun Brown, Rich McFadden, Denis Pitman, Angela Cimmino and Mike Yakawich) have failed on this issue and missed the opportunity to demonstrate true leadership.

The City Council should also understand that actions have consequences.

Some folks who spoke at the meeting, which began Monday evening, pointed out that events and gatherings may not happen here because gay and lesbian folks may be denied services. Businesses may opt to locate somewhere else because this may not be a comfortable environment for all their employees. Businesses don't want the hassle of having employees who are miserable because of shoddy treatment from the community. And since there are other towns with similar ordinances, this might be just enough for those businesses to say, "Not in that town," when it comes to Billings.

The timing of the vote couldn't be more ironic. The vote against the nondiscrimination ordinance --something that would have helped an entire segment of Billings be safer — happens just as the city ramps up its efforts for a public safety mill levy. The city will ask residents to support a hefty tax increase in order to keep Billings more safe as it grows. And yet, with its vote Tuesday, it has willfully chosen to make Billings less safe for others.



Catch the latest in Opinion

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


News Alerts

Breaking News